On 8 March, the media and politicians bombard us with statements about ‘International Women’s Day’, a secular holiday that was first celebrated in the Soviet Union in the 1920s and now, a hundred years later, suddenly seems to play a major role in the EU’s official calendar of celebrations. Is this a sign of a certain kindred spirit?

Ideological feminism is perpetuated and institutionalised by these celebrations, just as it is by the appointment of (almost always female) ‘equality ministers’ in almost all governments, or a dedicated ‘equality commissioner’ in the European Union.

Continue reading ““International Women’s Day”: ideological feminism is not interested in the well-being of women” →

Interview of Tonio Borg, former EU Health Commissioner and current President of the ONE OF US Federation with the German weekly Die Tagespost

Continue reading “Tonio Borg: “Commission’s stance on abortion is hypocritical and avoids due process. But all is not lost.”” →

Statement by the Presidency of COMECE on the European Commission’s decision regarding the European Citizens’
Initiative “My Voice, My Choice”

Continue reading “Catholic Bishops: “Funding abortions is contrary to EU’s foundational principles”” →

Priority question for written answer P-000838/2026
to the Commission
Margarita de la Pisa Carrión (PfE)

Continue reading “Misuse of European Social Fund for abortion raises questions” →

In its reply to the ECI “My Voice, My Choice”, the European Commission has spent a considerable amount of paper and ink in order to demonstrate that abortion is “healthcare”, and that the European Social Fund (ESF+) can be used to fund abortions. But while that reasoning is lengthy, it mainly proves things that do not need to be proven, while it fails to adduce convincing arguments where they would have been necessary. Very conspicuously, while abundantly citing from documents that have little relevance to the matter, the Commission avoids citing the only extant legal definition of “healthcare” within the EU legal order, one that makes a clear link between “healthcare” and the purpose and intention of restoring someones health. This omission is probably not a mere oversight or coincidence, but deliberate: whatever is not supportive of the Commission’s point of view is simply left out, treated as if it didn’t exist.

But if abortion is not “healthcare”, then the use of ESF+ money to finance abortion is clearly illegal – with all the implications and consequences that this may lead to.

Continue reading “If abortion is “healthcare”, then everything can be everything.” →

The EU likes to see itself as a benefactor of so-called ‘civil society’. The CERV programme in particular is intended to promote civil society engagement and strengthen democracy. In reality, however, the exact opposite is happening: the one-sided promotion of supposed non-governmental organisations based on clearly ideological criteria distorts democratic competition, and the organisations receiving funding become an extension of the European Commission, albeit without transparency or political accountability.

In this way, the Commission is systematically and deliberately creating an uneven playing field, in which those not agreeing to the Commission’s understanding of “our common values” (e.g., abortion, euthanasia, re-definition of marriage and family, etc.) must fight uphill battles.

Continue reading “The European Commission’s funding for the abortion lobby: Un-levelling the playing field” →

Abortion as a lifesaver? The EU Commission has fallen prey to the abortion lobby. Women, children and the European idea will pay the price. – A comment by Franziska Harter, editor-in-chief of the German weekly Die Tagespost.

Continue reading “Thus dieth the European idea” →

Commissioner Lahbib may find this ‘smart’, but for most Europeans it is simply an obscenity: not only is the European Commission redefining abortion as a ‘health service’ from the lectern of a press conference room in order to empower itself to finance it at the taxpayer’s expense, but in addition it wants to use the European Social Fund for this purpose, which in practice means that the funds to finance the killing of children will come precisely from a fund that was created with the purpose of helping the poor, the needy, and large families with small incomes. But the ESF, like any fund, is limited in size, and what is spent on killing children cannot be spent on helping the poor.

In other words: it is precisely the poor at whose expense the Commission wants to fund “abortion on demand”, the trademark of a morally irresponsible lifestyle. This is part of what they call “Social Policy”.

Continue reading “Plundering the Social Fund” →

The surprising announcement yesterday afternoon by Commissioners Lahbib and Mînzatu that abortions can now be financed by the European Social Fund (ESF+) is probably one of the most outrageous abuses of power in the history of the European Union, which is by no means lacking in such brazen transgressions. It is an attempt to change existing law without any legislative procedure, simply by means of a ‘communication’ – suddenly interpreting it in a completely different way than it has been understood until now. The Commission, to believe its own words, thinks that this is ‘smart’.

No, this course of action is not at all ‘smart’, but it is a clear violation of EU Treaties, which require that legal changes can only be enacted through legal procedures, not simply by holding a press conference in which it is announced that a law has, for reasons unknown, changed its meaning overnight. It also shows that the Von-der-Leyen Commission, which lectures everyone else on the importance of the “rule of law”, has a rather cavalier approach to that foundational legal principle and, it must be suspected, has probably no clue what that term even means. From a constitutional point of view, this rupture of constitutionality and breach of the rule of law is without doubt illegal and should give every democrat cause for concern, regardless of their worldview. If the executive power is allowed to re-interpret rules in this way, then nothing and nobody is secure anymore.

Continue reading “Legislating by press statement??? The Commission’s policy announcement on abortion is grossly unconstitutional” →

ONE OF US alarmed by the European Commission’s decision to fund abortions

The European Federation ONE OF US notes that no new EU fund will be created by the European Commission to finance cross-border abortion but expresses its deep concern and indignation at the European Commission’s response to the European Citizens’ Initiative (ECI) My Voice, My Choice’. For the first time, the Commission will open the possibility for an existing fund, the ESF+ (European Social Fund Plus), to finance abortion.

Continue reading “PRESS RELEASE: Statement by ONE OF US on the abortion initiative ‘My Voice, My Choice’” →