“When I use a word,” Humpty Dumpty said in rather a scornful tone, “it means just what I choose it to mean—neither more nor less.”
 “The question is,” said Alice, “whether you can make words mean so many different things.”
 “The question is,” said Humpty Dumpty, “which is to be master—that’s all.”

(Lewis Carroll: Through the Looking-Glass)

Someone who is otherwise known to be a brilliant lawyer and very committed to protecting the right to life of the unborn has told us that in his opinion it is difficult to dispute that a State may include abortion within healthcare, even under EU law, insofar as this practice is not explicitly excluded and the EU only has a supporting competence in this area. As a consequence of this, he opines that the European Social Fund (ESF+) could be used to fund abortions.

Continue reading “The “European Fund for Everything”” →

One of the most outlandish claims in the European Commission’s neo-socialist Gender Equality Strategy is the assertion that abortion and contraception will lead to economic growth and prosperity. Of course, the opposite is true: people who have no children have no future. Even those who have no moral objections to abortion should be able to grasp this much.

Continue reading “How abortion and contraception lead to economic and social decline” →

In the Soviet Union, of ill-famed memory, social progress was driven by so-called five-year plans, which were drawn up by the government bureaucracy and rubber-stamped by a sham parliament. In the People’s Republic of China and other communist dictatorships, this is still the case today. It is not society that is meant to influence political events; rather, the political elite seeks to control social life.

The European Commission has long been following this example when it sets itself a multi-annual work programme. This work programme then forms the basis for further planning, such as the “Gender Equality Strategy 2026-2030” presented a week ago, a gift from the Commission to its grateful citizens to mark “International Women’s Day” (a tradition also adopted from the Soviet Union).

Continue reading “The EU’s Gender-Socialist Five-Year Plan” →

Pro-Life MEPs and activists have expressed mixed feelings with regard to the Commission’s reply to the aborton initiative “My Voice My Choice” in a public debate held at the premises of the European Parliament in Strasbourg on Wednesday. MEP Matej Tonin from Slovenia and Ségolène du Closel of ONE OF US were very upbeat, pointing out thet the pro-aborts had lost on all accounts: There will be no special fund to fnance abortion tourism, there will be no extra money for abortion, they have not been able to force the Commission to do anything. And despite all their money from dark sources, despite spending ten times more per statement of support, they collected far less signatures than ONE OF US did in 2014, which shows that the pro-life position has much more support among EU citizens than the abortion agenda, however potent its financiers and political clout may be.

Continue reading “MEPs take up fight against misappropriation of European Social Fund – full video” →

The statistics are remarkable.

• 99% of those surveyed are happy with their lives.
• 97% answered yes to the question, “Do you like who you are?”
• 99% agreed with the statement, “Do you love your family?”

Do you know of any group of people, of any economic status, educational level, age, ethnicity, or geographic region that approaches those percentages? Who are these happy people?

Continue reading “Dutch MEP asks: will European Social Fund money soon be used to track and kill babies with Down Syndrome?” →

In its statement on the ‘My Voice, My Choice’ abortion initiative, the European Commission argues that ‘unsafe abortions’ pose a danger to women, which must be countered by misappropriating funds from the European Social Fund to finance abortions. What a hypocritical argument! The Commission uncritically makes its own the propaganda rhetoric of the abortion industry, which immediately collapses like a house of cards when seriously examined. Only fools fall for this lie – and those who, because they have a political or commercial interest in the legalisation of abortion, just pretend to believe it.

Continue reading “The hypocrisy surrounding ‘unsafe abortion’” →

Experts from the fields of medicine, law, ethics, politics and media met in Berlin on 6 March, shortly before International Women’s Day, to raise public awareness of a global billion-pound business: the business of female fertility and children as products.

A report by Anna Diouf /Tichys Einblick

Continue reading “Children as commodities? Conference calls for global ban on surrogacy” →

On 8 March, the media and politicians bombard us with statements about ‘International Women’s Day’, a secular holiday that was first celebrated in the Soviet Union in the 1920s and now, a hundred years later, suddenly seems to play a major role in the EU’s official calendar of celebrations. Is this a sign of a certain kindred spirit?

Ideological feminism is perpetuated and institutionalised by these celebrations, just as it is by the appointment of (almost always female) ‘equality ministers’ in almost all governments, or a dedicated ‘equality commissioner’ in the European Union.

Continue reading ““International Women’s Day”: ideological feminism is not interested in the well-being of women” →

Interview of Tonio Borg, former EU Health Commissioner and current President of the ONE OF US Federation with the German weekly Die Tagespost

Continue reading “Tonio Borg: “Commission’s stance on abortion is hypocritical and avoids due process. But all is not lost.”” →