The EU’s new Victims’ Rights Directive, which aims to establish uniform standards for victims of war crimes, is the first EU legislative act to seek to make abortion a “right”. This is a dangerous precedent – and that is precisely what it is intended to be: the highly emotive (but in reality rare) case of a child conceived through rape is being used as a pretext to introduce a “right to abortion” into EU law. Once this has been done, the scope and application of this supposed “right” – which is in reality a grave injustice – can and will be extended in whatever direction one pleases.

What is left out of consideration is that abortion constitutes the deliberate killing of a child who is in no way to blame for the circumstances that led to its conception. This so-called ‘victim’s right’ is essentially an uncivilised act of revenge against an innocent child who is, as it were, killed in place of his or her father. This was decided by politicians who are immensely proud of their stance against the death penalty.

Continue reading “Disgusting: the EU invokes alleged ‘victims’ rights’ to justify the killing of children” →

The Ordo Iuris Institute submitted to representatives of the European Commission a legal analysis concerning the European Commission’s communication dated February 26, 2026, relating to the European Citizens’ Initiative “My Voice, My Choice.”

In response to a written question from Members of the European Parliament, the European Commission has now been forced to admit that it (indirectly) funded the “My Voice, My Choice” abortion initiative. This is an embarrassment not only for the Commission, whose claim to be an impartial and objective “guardian of the Treaties” is thus called into question, but also for the abortion initiative, whose narrative of a “grassroots movement” collapses like a failed soufflé

Continue reading “Now it is official: European Commission co-funded pro-abortion initiative “My Voice, My Choice”” →

 “When I use a word,” Humpty Dumpty said in rather a scornful tone, “it means just what I choose it to mean—neither more nor less.”
 “The question is,” said Alice, “whether you can make words mean so many different things.”
 “The question is,” said Humpty Dumpty, “which is to be master—that’s all.”

(Lewis Carroll: Through the Looking-Glass)

Someone who is otherwise known to be a brilliant lawyer and very committed to protecting the right to life of the unborn has told us that in his opinion it is difficult to dispute that a State may include abortion within healthcare, even under EU law, insofar as this practice is not explicitly excluded and the EU only has a supporting competence in this area. As a consequence of this, he opines that the European Social Fund (ESF+) could be used to fund abortions.

Continue reading “The “European Fund for Everything”” →

One of the most outlandish claims in the European Commission’s neo-socialist Gender Equality Strategy is the assertion that abortion and contraception will lead to economic growth and prosperity. Of course, the opposite is true: people who have no children have no future. Even those who have no moral objections to abortion should be able to grasp this much.

Continue reading “How abortion and contraception lead to economic and social decline” →

In the Soviet Union, of ill-famed memory, social progress was driven by so-called five-year plans, which were drawn up by the government bureaucracy and rubber-stamped by a sham parliament. In the People’s Republic of China and other communist dictatorships, this is still the case today. It is not society that is meant to influence political events; rather, the political elite seeks to control social life.

The European Commission has long been following this example when it sets itself a multi-annual work programme. This work programme then forms the basis for further planning, such as the “Gender Equality Strategy 2026-2030” presented a week ago, a gift from the Commission to its grateful citizens to mark “International Women’s Day” (a tradition also adopted from the Soviet Union).

Continue reading “The EU’s Gender-Socialist Five-Year Plan” →

Pro-Life MEPs and activists have expressed mixed feelings with regard to the Commission’s reply to the aborton initiative “My Voice My Choice” in a public debate held at the premises of the European Parliament in Strasbourg on Wednesday. MEP Matej Tonin from Slovenia and Ségolène du Closel of ONE OF US were very upbeat, pointing out thet the pro-aborts had lost on all accounts: There will be no special fund to fnance abortion tourism, there will be no extra money for abortion, they have not been able to force the Commission to do anything. And despite all their money from dark sources, despite spending ten times more per statement of support, they collected far less signatures than ONE OF US did in 2014, which shows that the pro-life position has much more support among EU citizens than the abortion agenda, however potent its financiers and political clout may be.

Continue reading “MEPs take up fight against misappropriation of European Social Fund – full video” →

The statistics are remarkable.

• 99% of those surveyed are happy with their lives.
• 97% answered yes to the question, “Do you like who you are?”
• 99% agreed with the statement, “Do you love your family?”

Do you know of any group of people, of any economic status, educational level, age, ethnicity, or geographic region that approaches those percentages? Who are these happy people?

Continue reading “Dutch MEP asks: will European Social Fund money soon be used to track and kill babies with Down Syndrome?” →

In its statement on the ‘My Voice, My Choice’ abortion initiative, the European Commission argues that ‘unsafe abortions’ pose a danger to women, which must be countered by misappropriating funds from the European Social Fund to finance abortions. What a hypocritical argument! The Commission uncritically makes its own the propaganda rhetoric of the abortion industry, which immediately collapses like a house of cards when seriously examined. Only fools fall for this lie – and those who, because they have a political or commercial interest in the legalisation of abortion, just pretend to believe it.

Continue reading “The hypocrisy surrounding ‘unsafe abortion’” →